what’s in a name?
From the Guardian’s reporting on the supplemental request for additional funds to fight the war in Iraq (emphasis mine):
I am certainly upset by the amount spent on this war (see yesterday’s post), but I am, in a way, more dismayed by its new name. It just sounds like something you read about in your European History class.
The spending on the Iraq conflict alone is now approaching the cost of the Korean war, about $330bn in today's dollars. Meanwhile the cost of the overall "war on terror" - relabeled The Long War in the Pentagon - is already close to half a trillion dollars, and will soon equal that of the 13-year Vietnam war.
I am certainly upset by the amount spent on this war (see yesterday’s post), but I am, in a way, more dismayed by its new name. It just sounds like something you read about in your European History class.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home